The combination shown here is huge, and it is heavy: quite exactly 2.5 kg (!!) including the batteries. Stevemark wrote: The chrome nose FD 1.2/55mm was probably meant to be used on the F-1 camera. Thanks to Michael for taking care about the FD 55 f1.2 But then that's really only of concern if you'll be using the lenses on Canon FD film cameras. Of course, the other big difference is the FD is designed for full-aperture metering whereas the FL has to be stopped down to meter.
The FD's reflections are a bit deeper in color than the FL's. About the only difference I can tell between them is the coatings. Both lenses have apertures from 1.2 to 16, both have the same minimum focusing distance of a bit under 2 feet or 0.6 meters, both have a 58mm front filter size. I can detect essentially no difference between the two lenses from a performance standpoint. My verdict: I suspect that the optical formulas for the both the FL and FD 55mm f/1.2 lenses are the same. I didn't notice the blur until I had put everything away and called the images up on my computer. Enough to rearrange things slightly, and unfortunately enough to cause some blur at f/8 for the FL lens and at f/16 for the FD lens. There was still a slight breeze blowing when I was taking the photos. No post processing was done other than reducing the images to be shown here.
Trifox 150 motorsiklet plus#
I used Live View for focusing accuracy, plus the camera was mounted onto a sturdy tripod.
Trifox 150 motorsiklet iso#
This is the flower I took pics of today.Īll images were taken at ISO 100. Today it was sunny, so motion-induced blur wasn't as big of a problem. There was a slight breeze blowing, so even if I would have set up a tripod, the shutter speeds would have been way too slow to avoid montion-induced blur. It was getting late in the day, but I did manage to take two photos hand held with the lens at f/1.2.
Trifox 150 motorsiklet full#
Yesterday I looked for a subject around the house and noticed that one of our azalea bushes is already in full bloom. Is there a significant difference? Well, I'll let you be the judge. I happen to have a copy of the FL 55mm f/1.2, so that's what I did, an AB comparison between the two. Since this is the early FD version of the 55mm f/1.2 - pre-SSC and all that - I was wondering just how different it was from its immediate predecessor, the FL 55mm f/1.2. Nonetheless, I figured I could give the lens a fair evaluation, so I went for it.īut just to make things interesting, I decided to do a comparison. Even so, the only digital camera I have to test it with is an EOS, so using my FD to EOS adapter - with the corrective element removed - the only thing I can do with it is close-up stuff.
My schedule and the weather have prevented me from doing much of anything with it until today. ARKADAŞLAR BENDE BİR TANE VAR.İSTEYENE UYGUN FİATA VEREBİLİRİM.MOTORLU KURYE FİRMAM VAR İZMİRDE.KIŞIN KÖTÜ HAVA KOŞULLARINDA KULLANIYORUZ SADECE.2006 MODEL 2008 TRAFİĞE ÇIKIŞLI.İŞİMİZİ BÜYÜTÜYORUZ.ARABA ALMAYI DÜŞÜNÜYORUZ.ARKADAŞLARIMIZIN SAVRULAM KONUSUNDAKİ ŞÜPHELERİNEDE DEVAMLI KULLANAN BİRİSİ OLARAK YANIT VEREBİLİRİM.ARACIN KASASI ŞASEDEN BAĞIMSIZ ÇALIŞIR.DİREKSİYON HAREKETİNİZDE KASA OTOMATİK OLARAK DÖNÜŞ YÖNÜNÜZE EĞİM VERİR.BÖYLECE DÖNÜŞLERİNİZDE ÇOK RAHAT BİR MANEVRAYI YAPMIŞ OLURSUNUZ.İLK KULLANIMDA ACEMİLİK ÇEKİLEBİLİR.HER MOTORDA OLDUĞU GİBİ AMA ALIŞTIĞINIZ ZAMANKİ KEYFİNE DİYECEK YOKTUR.KOLTUKLARI ÇOK RAHATTIR.ARKADA YOLCU İÇİN KOLÇAKLAR MVCUTTUR.SİLECEKTEN HOPARLÖRE TAM DONANIMIYLA OTOMİBİLİN KONFORUNU ARATMAZ.BENDE İKİNCİ EL ALDIM ÖNCEKİ SAHİBİ DAHA ÖNCE HİÇ MOTOR KULLANMAMIŞ.KASASINDA UFAK TEFEK HASARLARI VARDI ALDIĞIMDA.BEN ÖYLE KULLANDIM ALAN ARKADAŞTA KULLANABİLİR O ŞEKİLDE.UFAK TEFEK BAKIMIDA VARDIR.BU ŞEKLİYLE 1800 TL YE VERMEYİ DÜŞÜNÜYORUM.İHTİYACI OLANA.BANA GSM TELEFONLARIMDAN ULAŞABİLİRSİNİZ.Posted: Sun 12:33 am Post subject: Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 Chrome NoseĬooltouch wrote: Okay, thanks to Trifox (Stan), I have had the opportunity to try out this Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 (chrome nose) for the past several days.